![]() Until now, Italy has allowed beach clubs’ licences to be renewed automatically, a practice which has strained relationships between Rome and Brussels. This is off the back of the EU Bolkenstein directive’s objective for market liberalisation. As part of Italy’s post-COVID recovery plan, the government agreed to reforms which would force bathing establishments to re-apply for their licences. Parasols line a beach in italy Pexels Beach club licensing reforms could liberalise the marketīut things could be about to change. For some they’re a symbol of the country’s post-war economic revival and synonymous with ‘la dolce vita.’īut the sweet life also comes with a saltier price - access to bathing club facilities averages €20-30 a day, and can be as high as €150 for more exclusive establishments. Largely family-controlled and passed down from one generation to the next, their rows of chairs, umbrellas and brightly-coloured wooden huts have become an unmistakable feature of the Italian coastline. ![]() ‘We want our work to be recognised’: Italy’s bathing clubs cling on to their beachesīathing establishments, or ‘stabilimenti balneari’, are a long-standing tradition in Italy. In a new “beach war” that could be described as a conflict on multiple fronts, Rome now finds itself fending off a disgruntled lido lobby and outspoken environmental campaigners in a messy fight over the future of Italy’s coastline. The City of Manhattan Beach is now working to construct and install an updated plaque that will provide a factually accurate account of the history of Bruce's Beach, which will be placed at the top of the park, according to CBS Los Angeles.As details of the decree are yet to be voted on by the Lower House and are still up in the air, following prime minister Mario Draghi’s resignation and the government’s collapse, Italy’s bathing clubs fear that such a shake-up would threaten the privileges they have enjoyed for decades. ![]() A plaque reading "Bruce's Beach" was then installed on the property. The property's original name, Bruce's Beach, was officially restored by the Manhattan Beach City Council in 2006, with Mayor Mitch Ward, the city's first and only Black mayor, leading the renaming campaign. "The seizure of Bruce's Beach nearly a century ago was an injustice inflicted upon not just Willa and Charles Bruce but generations of their descendants who almost certainly would have been millionaires," wrote Hahn in this week's statement. It marked the first time that the government made appropriations for land taken from a Black family, CBS Los Angeles reported. County Lifeguard Training Center is now located, toward the end of July. Los Angeles County officials gave the deed for the Bruce's Beach property to Bruce family members during a ceremony held on the land, where the L.A. Terms of the transfer agreement completed last June called for the property to be leased back to the county for 24 months, with an annual rent of $413,000 plus all operation and maintenance costs, and a possible sale back to the county for nearly $20 million, the estimated value. "This was an opportunity for a leisure business to provide services to African Americans who wanted to come to the beach," Alison Rose Jefferson, a historian whose research focused on the history of Black Americans in California beach towns, told "60 Minutes" at the time. Anthony Bruce, from left, a great-great-grandson of Charles and Willa Bruce wife, Sandra Kavon Ward, founder of Justice for Bruce's Beach Derrick Bruce, great-grandson of Charles and Willa Bruce Chief Duane Yellow Feather Shepard and Mitch Ward attend a dedication ceremony in Manhattan Beach, Calif., Wednesday, July 20, 2022. Bruce's Beach was among the first oceanfront properties in the area that was Black-owned and served the Black community, as "60 Minutes" reported in 2021. ![]() They built and opened Bruce's Beach as a small resort for Black residents on the south shore of Santa Monica Bay. The land in the city of Manhattan Beach was purchased in 1912 by Willa and Charles Bruce, entrepreneurs who had migrated to California from across the country and owned two plots of oceanfront property in the area. ![]() Bradford, who authored the state legislation that enabled the land's return, said he supported the heirs' decision to sell it to the county because current zoning regulations would prevent them from developing it in an economically beneficial manner. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |